![Why Ethereum [ETH] address outflows may be headed for DeFi](https://cryptonoiz.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/AMBCrypto_An_image_of_a_stylized_Ethereum_logo_with_arrows_poin_22f2aeff-c7bb-4c7d-aec7-547a37a35e82-1-1000x600-360x180.jpg){kind=logo}
ApeCoin DAO, a governance system serving the democratic rights of ApeCoin (APE) holders — a digital asset tied to the Bored Ape Yacht Membership ecosystem — published an official proposal on Could 2 to debate whether or not the asset ought to stay on Ethereum, transition to a layer-2 various, or maybe discover the opportunity of chain migration.
The ApeCoin Enchancment Proposal, titled “AIP-41: Preserve ApeCoin inside the Ethereum ecosystem,” was authored by BAYC 2491, often called ASEC, and drew inspiration from a variety of incidents, together with the turbulent Otherdeed mint and subsequent Yuga Labs response.
The calamitous fallout of Yuga Labs’ Otherdeeds metaverse land sale intensely scrutinized the monetary limitations of Ethereum’s gasoline price mechanics and prompted the main members of the ApeCoin group to vocalize their considerations round ApeCoin’s mounted provide contract and scalability potential.
The overwhelming deflation of the gasoline wars, and lack of economic inclusion or integrity, was then additional compounded by Yuga Labs’ poorly-calculated tweet insisting that “It appears abundantly clear that ApeCoin might want to migrate to its personal chain with the intention to correctly scale” and that “We’d prefer to encourage the DAO to start out pondering on this course.”
Regardless of the imploring suggestion from Yuga Labs, AIP-41 passionately advocated in opposition to the migration from Ethereum, stating that “such a choice is at the moment too advanced and dear to make” and doubtlessly might harm their deep-rooted presence on the community with the biggest quantity and cultural adoption of nonfungible tokens (NFTs).
“We the ApeCoin DAO consider that, no less than in the meanwhile, ApeCoin ought to stay inside the Ethereum ecosystem, and never migrate elsewhere to an L1 chain or sidechain not secured by Ethereum.”
The overall votes on the proposal equated to three.8 million for and three.3 million in opposition to — a 53.62% cut up. This final result will not be completely definitive and could be additional deliberated with the submission of latest proposals inside a three-month grace interval.
